Sunday, July 30, 2017
Thursday, July 20, 2017
Monday, July 10, 2017
Wednesday, July 5, 2017
Sunday, July 2, 2017
Saturday, July 1, 2017
When I look at the current state of U.S. liberal democrats,
it reminds of watching a semi-cool white person on the streets of Memphis
trying to juk. They are more than out of
place, off rhythm and seemingly unaware of both, which puts them out of touch
with reality and the perspectives of others watching them. It is as if they did not learn any lessons
from the victory of Donald Trump in 2016 and like zombies, respond to only
things that they see the mainstream media tell them to be outraged about. No
real issues, just outrage here, outrage there, here an outrage, there an
outrage, everywhere an outrage. Russia collusion or Russian hacking. Trump
tweeted this or Trump tweeted that. It is like the dance of the person in
Memphis, awkward and an indicator of the dim electoral future liberals have in
the U.S. if they do not get on beat.
For starters, they saw what worked for Trump and Bernie
Sanders yet they pull out the same old veer offense that continues to turn the
ball over after 3 downs. They should be able to observe that they need a
similar and HONEST message presented by a younger and more genuine person, not
just some east or west coast big wig city elite to garble mumbo jumbo on 30
second commercials that don’t offer policy solutions for everybody. Instead they run out city slick carpetbagger
named Ossoff to run in a district in which he did not live in and spend $23million and worse, did not harvest as many votes as Rodney Stooksbury, the
Democrat listed on the ballot during the general election last November. Or as
Newsweek put it: “Rodney Stooksbury, who raised no money and had no campaign website or online presence.
Trump can say the word puzzy and liberals run out of their
house to protest, complain and destroy property, yet seem to forget and equally
said nothing and saw no offence in President Obama bombing kids around the globe and cats in Flint have no water to drink and being ordered by democrats to pay for what they cannot consume or face foreclosure. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee just recently called for President Trump to resign for his tweets attacking
Mika Brzezinski. Last I heard the dozens
isn’t illegal. Putting it plainly it is
like Mika saying “Donald you dumb and ride the retarded bus” and Trump
responding “yo momma smoke crack rock.” End of story (if you cannot stand the
heat get out of the kitchen).
This is just one problem; how do they justify calling
themselves liberal or progressive if they ignore global suffering and continue to promulgate neoliberal policy that causes suffering not only in the US but
around the globe because of wars promoting the global imperialistic goals of
neoliberal republicans and democrats?
This dance doesn’t end there. As 2018 quickly approaches, they still lack
not only a solid policy message but also candidates. They have Tulsi Gabbard who is on the record
calling for restoring Glass-Steagall, consistently is opposed to regime change,
is against any cuts to Medicare or Social Security and the NSA’s bulk
collection of data. But Gabbard speaks her mind and equally goes against the core liberals in the democratic party.
This faction question her passion for LGBT and abortion rights. They
also will never forget that she doesn’t tote the party line on fundamental
Islamic terrorism noting that for over the last decade most terrorist attacks
conducted around the world are the result of “radical Islamic ideology.” Even more of a concern for the democratic
establishment was her resolution she introduced to prioritize Christians and Yezidis — when granting refugee status.
But Gabbard is ignored and even avoided, just as several
other noteworthy leaders of the new school like Kimberly Ellis (as the vote for
the Democratic party chair of California held its election demonstrated) and
former Ohio state senator Nina Turner. Instead they prefer others like New
Jersey senator Cory Booker, Maryland congressman John Delaney and relative
newcomer Senator Kamala Harris of California.
Harris is interesting, she has come to political fruition
after she was cut off by her colleagues in the Senate while she questioned
Attorney General Jeff Sessions (an event that she quickly used to raise tens of thousands of dollars) and came to politics being the 29-year-old girlfriend of California Assembly Speaker Willie Brown when he was 60. In 1994 Brown named Harris to the California Medical Assistance Commission, before that he
appointed her to the state Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. She was
described by several people at the Capitol as Brown’s girlfriend.” Harris barley was elected California’s Attorney General in 2010 by about 50,000 after provisional ballots were counted.
While AG, her department argued against expanding the early release program for inmates on the basis that it would deplete the cheap (slave) labor force. Many see Harris as a corporatist and in the mold of the establishment democratic core of the state.
These inconsistencies make the democrats seem fickle. Take the recent health care debate
ironically, in California. Nurses, unions and average citizens were
overwhelming in support of what was described as a single payer Medicare for
all (the Healthy California Act). But Democrats who maintain complete control
of the state to pass a bill like this, did the opposite. In support of
corporate donors in the healthcare, insurance and pharmaceutical industries,
Democratic state Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon helped to block a
Democrat-sponsored bill to create the Healthy California Act. Reports indicate
that Rendon has taken in more than
$101,000 from pharmaceutical companies and another $50,000 from major health insurers over the past 5 years. This is par for the course considering
that the California Democratic Party has received more than $1.2 million from
the specific groups opposing the bill, and more than $2 million from
pharmaceutical and health insurance industry donors.
Democrats must show that they are the party of the people.
However, their addiction to corporate plutocratic funding seems to prevent them
from being able to do such. Not to mention that it abrogates the voices of the
citizenry they claim to represent. The liberal establishment wing of the
Democratic party is Cleary out of touch, out of step and off beat – awkward
choreography sure to lead them to where they do not want to be in 2018.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)