Saturday, February 18, 2017
The sudden resignation of National Security Adviser and retired General Michael Flynn and the unprecedented leaks pouring
out to damage and even destroy the Trump presidency is a throwback to what I
recall other nations (namely autocratic or communist regimes) did when the
political status quo felt threatened. Likewise, they often emerged as a
consequence of actions taken by top members in state sponsored intelligence operations.
There are several possibilities for this
including oscitant retribution proffered by folk like former CIA director John Brennan and former acting CIA Director Michael Morell, or even a backlash by
career officials (Democratic politicians and, more importantly, theintelligence community) in an effort for whatever reason, to keep Trump from
instituting his foreign policy agenda.
Sadly many in the elite east coast press
and large numbers of Democrats support these actions while failing to accept
and admit that for unelected officials to go around the constitution and imped
policy efforts of a democratically elected official, whether you support that
official or not, is seditious and boarders on actions of former governments run
by police apparatus like the Stasi of East Germany.
The Stasi was a shorthand term used to
describe the East German State Security "Staatssicherheit." It was a
combination of the United States FBI, CIA and NSA for lack of a better
description, meaning they had policing, investigating and uninhibited
surveillance powers. The Stasi was responsible for hundreds of thousands of
perceived political opponents being tried without due process, imprisoned and
even murdered in an effort to suffocate political dissention against all the
tenants of conventional democratic standards.
Most people they imprisoned and executed
where charged with specific acts such as engaging in "propaganda hostile to the state," interfering in “activities of the state or society" orthe "treasonable relaying of information." In addition to domestic
surveillance, the Stasi was also responsible for foreign surveillance. Through
the use of wiretapping (it is illegal to wiretap the U.S. President) and
anonymous unsourced claims unaided by any evidence (sounds familiar), for more
than four decades, the Stasi operated unfettered and without remorse until the
collapse of Communist East Germany and the opening of the borders with West Germany in 1989. These type of energies seem to have been put into action
inside the Beltway as it regards the Trump administration.
It is obvious that there is a real fear or
hatred for Trump as he goes about his campaign promise to “drain the swamp” and
dismantle the bureaucratic system of politics including the FBI, CIA and NSA
and their historic abuse of unfettered power that they feels places them over
the elected government. Also clear, is that even before Hillary Clinton ran,
highbrow member of the Washington political establishment, including assets of
the U.S. intelligence apparatus, were supporting her hook, line and sinker.
From former acting CIA Director Michael Morell and Gen. Michael Hayden who
served in the capacity of both director of the NSA and CIA under George W.
Bush. Both men, without evidence or proof asserted that Trump was a “useful fool” and Russian agent being influenced by Putin.
Upon which, immediately rumors started to
be thrown into the political ether. In particular when then candidate Trump continuously rejected the establishment narrative of the media and intelligence
community that under the direct orders of Putin, Russia hacked the Democratic
National Committee and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta emails in order to
interfere with the election on the side and behalf of the Republican nominee.
This was followed by a pile-on by the Democratic Party which since then have
willingly encompassed this effort to disrupt the elected President who they gave no chance of winning.
Since then we have had the Trump “dossier”
which was produced by a former member of the British intelligence agency MI6 and hired first by a never-Trump super Pac and then the Democratic Party to find some dirt on Trump. This report fell apart, although the media tried to
establish a narrative that it was true, when it was proven that unlike the
dossier stated as fact, Trump lawyer Michael Cohen had never secretly traveled to Prague in August to meet with Russian officials or had ever been to
Czceh Republic..
Why would the intelligence establishment
take this path? Well even a blind person can see that their preferences for
Clinton was in line with all of their desired policy objectives: Trump wants to work with Putin to destroy ISIS and Clinton wanted to go deeper into Syria in an effort to get Assad out of office as she did Gadhafi in Libya. For this
reason if my logic is tenable, targeting Trumps security executives would be
paramount. More than likely, Flynn was
planning to try and reform and change the mindset of the national security
state in America. Such would have surly been an economic loss the military
industrial complex could not afford to take a chance on. It has been said that all wars are banker’s
wars and we are well aware that banks dole out large sums of money to the US
military and intelligence apparatus.
The short of the story is that the East
Germany Stasi, even if not in body, in action is alive in the administrative
halls of Washington, DC. Like the Stasi,
elements in the U.S. intelligence community are essentially committing treason
against the Office of the President of the United States by leaking classified
material to the press. This is also without a doubt happening with the urging
and assistance of former Obama administration appointees because anonymous
leaks without any evidence at all is speculation, guessing and/or gossip. Unfortunately,
the democrats and mainstream media flunkies are more than giddy to run with any
claim, substantiated or not to bring down Trump and his administration. This is
the most probably scenario given from the Obama years, we know the immense
powers the U.S. intelligence community has through the leaks (not anonymous) of
Edward Snowden alone and that he gave them even more powers days before leaving office. As one writer noted: “Selectively disclosing details of private conversations monitored by the FBI or NSA gives the permanent state the power to destroy reputations from the cloak of anonymity. This is what policestates do."
Any assertion regarding Russia’s interference in U.S. elections as
been presented based on guess and without evidence. The charges with Flynn
began with the remnants of the Obama Department of Justice when then acting
attorney general Sally Yates told the White House counsel that Flynn was not telling the truth with respect to talking about sanctions with the Russian ambassador. How did she know this and who authorized wiretapping Flynn’s
communication? Still, we do not know if this was true since the phone
transcripts have not been released. All I can state is that these attacks
against the President and his administration were planned and contrived in what
I perceive as a hidden effort to thwart the will of the American people by
elements representative of the Democratic Party, the U.S. intelligence establishment
and mainstream media.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment