Showing posts with label Poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poverty. Show all posts
Friday, May 31, 2019
Abstruse
means difficult to understand. I was
called abstruse once when attempting to explain the distinction between index
coefficients in canonical correlation analysis compared to those in standard
structural equation modeling. From that one day in class more than 25 years
ago, I still have a fondness for the term as an apt descriptive of myself.
Personally, I do not consider my plane spoken comportment to be difficult to
understand, but rather that most outside of the world of science, do not abide
by taking one’s words as what they mean and are stated to mean. Many cases this
is because people have bias that frequently prevent them from acknowledging
facts that they too may be aware of but typically avoid because they do not support
or confirm to their personal, political or philosophical narrative. Consequently,
many consider that my views on race in 21st century America, as a
Black man too are abstruse in the age of Black Lives Matter and continuous charges
of seeing racism everywhere someone goes.
Today,
race and racism are seen around every corner. Whether if it is the orcs in Lord of the Rings or asking a group of black men with a history of dining and dashing to pay before they are served. Whenever a cop, especially a white cop
shoots or kills a Black man, it is an instant racist success. Are any of these truly
racist acts or are they rooted in common sense? If a group of white men with a
history of dining and dashing were confronted by a Black person, would it still
be racist? I ask this because for many Blacks in America, it seems they
consider the biggest obstacle to success and achievement in America is racism.
I vehemently disagree.
First,
as one born in segregation in the deep south, nothing that we as Black folk
confront, even the police is as racist as it was in the late 1950s and 1960s –
NOTHING. For people to form an organization as if this is a real problem is
sinister, superficial and disingenuous and I can provide elucidation on this.
In 2017, there were 1147 killings by police of which 149 were unarmed including 49 Blacks and 51 whites. There are approximately 900,000 law enforcementofficers in the U.S., a nation with 328.7 million citizens of which 47.4 million (14.6%) are black and of that 21.5 million (48% of Blacks) are male. Using
simple math, this means there was 1 Black killed for every 6.5 million U.S.
citizens, 1 for approximately every 967,000 Black citizens and 1 for every
438,000 Black male citizens. When the same analysis is conducted using
drowning, of which 2,760 Blacks died because of drowning, this accounted for 1
out of 118,000 U.S. citizens, 1 out of every 17,000 Black citizens and 1 out of
every 7,700 Black male citizens. Thus, the query, if Black lives mattered, wouldn’t
or shouldn’t drowning be higher than Blacks killed by police?
Such
analysis is factual yet remain ignored. I have done similar analysis with Black
accident victims, those of cardiovascular disease deaths and Black homicide
victims – all way more significant that Blacks killed by police. I am not
saying that this is not a problem, but rather it is disingenuous to say this is
a major problem. But when I consider Black kids shooting each other, maternal mortality, poor education outcomes in the form of dropout rates and reading and math proficiency, poverty, health and employment, police killing Blacks isn’t
that important and is more so an outcome of our learned helplessness.
The
modern world view that appears to be only applicable to Blacks born in America
is that we are helpless and cannot do for ourselves without the pity of whites.
This nature is never applied to Jews, Koreans, Jamaicans, Nigerians or Chinese,
just us. It is as if we have been taught as Black people that racism is more
important than it is or that we have been taught over the past few decades that
Blacks in America are the ONLY and first race in history to be proud to think
we cannot succeed unless we have ideal conditions. Think about it, it suggests
that because we are having problems we will never achieve or have success. It
seems to be forgotten that we as a people had success even with Jim Crow and
segregation. It is the goal of racist to implant such ideas to make us obsess
about racism, even subtle, that we cannot succeed until racism is obviated.
This is neurotic and illogical.
Yes,
white privilege is real, but how does Black folk always talking about it solve
our problems? Unfortunately, when you address it, you are attacked. Take the example
of Bill Cosby. Cosby said what our parents and grand parents said. Be
responsible, take care of your kids, study and work hard. Just saying that is
what mad Ta-Nehisi Coates his career. His first major piece in the Atlantic
attacked Cosby for “respectability politics.” What is wrong with being
respectable? I know no Black mother father, grand mother or grand father that
do not desire or preach for their kids to be respectable. Eric Dyson got so mad he wrote a book attacking Cosby for what in essences, Blacks have been
teaching their offspring for more than a century. From their position, it is
wrong o teach people to be responsible, respectable, and to believe you can succeed
on your merit alone regardless of economic circumstances and history shows that
we can, have and did achieve and only stopped this approach in the mid-1980s. It
is easy to make a baby, but it is hard to be a father.
We need
to take responsibility for not only ourselves but equally our families and
communities. But according to Coates, asking people to be responsible and to raise
their children is blaming the victim although we all see and know that
individual behavioral dysfunction (speaking proper English is acting white,
studying hard is acting white or reading is acting white) is the groundwork of
African American economic disadvantage. First generation Asians in NYC who
barely speak English hold education the highest of all aspirations so much so
that many go without food and basic amenities, so they can pay for tutoring for their children. This is too much for us because we are locked in on being victims
and the targets of steady racism. If we do not instill a capacity to function
and compete in our children, we will never have equality of outcomes and crying
racism will do nothing to accomplish such. Sure, Affirmative action will
improve numbers and get you in the door, but it will never address the
fundamental problem behind why our children do not stay in or perform well in
the top institutions of higher learning in America. This is a problem because it means Blacks
will always be a peonage class collectively. To put it simply, we cannot blame
white people for the failures in our communities or us as parents not doing
homework or reading with their kids.
Blacks
in Barbados, a nation also impacted by slavery and with high population of
single parent households see their kids on average score 1300 on the SAT. Across
Africa, the average GMAT score is approximately 510 compared to 433 for U.S.Blacks.
Once
jokingly, a colleague of mine (a physicist) said: “now we can describe victimization
as a time dependent projection matrix with intersectionality being the op-diagonal
matrix coefficient.” It made perfect sense to me, for it implied that you have
a set of characteristics which are ranked, typically on race and how they rate
on the victim hierarchy, and it changes over time as a function of other
intersectional variables such as religion, gender, and sexuality. This is where
we are as Black people – we want people to lower standards for us to succeed as
if we to dumb, stupid, disadvantaged and oppressed to do well on our own
effort.
Acknowledging
that a white person has white privilege such that they see me as helpless and
inferior and can only achieve with white assistance and handouts is not only
insulting but also the axiology of racism. It is the same disposition that
whites exhibited toward Blacks during slavery, Jim Crow and the Black Codes. It is the same disposition that led to
segregated schools from Boston to Little Rock, for the good of Blacks. Still we incessantly repeat the lunacy that
Blacks will never have success until white come to terms with racism. I do not
even know what that means. Is it saying that once this Fourier eutopia happens,
then and only then, Blacks will be able to achieve success in America? Is it
saying that once progressive liberal whites admit their white privileges, and
atone for this original sin by admitting their inherent racism and worship
their God Ta-Nehisi Coates will make it all good for Blacks only then? I think
Not.
No
matter how much white people read Coates and hoist the scarlet letter of white privilege,
it will do nothing to address the underlying conditions that alone are contributing
to our collective behavioral dysfunction. So far it has only resulted in a
defensive populous that seeks to talk about the books by Black authors they
read and endless pedantic twitter rants and op-eds that serve only to feed
their egos, for targeted action in their minds directed at solving problems are
not as essential as constantly complaining and blaming white people.
Thursday, May 18, 2017
For long as I can recall, at least after the civil rights era, the economic prosperity in the African American community has been on the decline. Ironically this started under the purview of a new approach to economics trumpeted to be the end all and be all to the problems (economic and civil) that confronted the U.S. since the end of the Vietnam war. This is what it was supposed to be but what it became was a new-fangled form of lassez-faire policy that to date, has serve to retard economic growth and increased disparities in wealth and income inequality in the U.S. and worldwide.
You got it, I am speaking about neoliberalism. I have defined neoliberalism policy as policy that transfers controls of economic factors from the public sector to the private sector. Neoliberals rather in the form of Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama, Tony Blair or The Clinton’s assert that economic and foreign policy that removes trade barriers and restrictions on capital flows is the best thing you can do to create job growth, economic prosperity, wealth and more importantly, eliminate or at least, lift folk out of poverty. Although apolitical, after the 80s, democrats (social democrats in France, Labor in England & Democrats in the U.S.) used this ideology to usher in and promote their views on domestic and foreign policy. A strange occurrence, since historically, these political parties were framed as being the representative of the little man, main street, the factory worker and union member. Establishing neoliberal free market foreign and domestic would mean that the democrats would not have to work with the vulture class. This meant forming more relationships with the elite and wealth of the big cities more so than the lowly farmers of the Midwest or miners in other states. Even in urban areas, it meant economic ostracization for minority communities until it was time to secure their vote.
This alone demanded that Democrats listen and accept more ideas from the wealthy and affluent, and it has been the same since Tony Blair and the Clinton’s. Although democrats proclaim their policies serve progressive and liberal objectives, the harsh reality is that the do not. They have led to the destruction of unions and reduction in collective bargaining rights while they claim to be the party of the working class. They have tightened relationships with the white-collar elite and for taking their money, have put in place policy that has help to suppress wages and wage growth. These policies have also resulted in the ruination of the auto industry as we have witnessed in Detroit. But they did not stop there. Starting with Bill Clinton, they even deregulated banks and had the gumption to tell the working poor that their situation was due to education, while rich liberals ignore the fact that even going to college, whether one finishes with a degree or not results in most African Americans having amassed nearly two times the amount of student loan debt than whites. Even Obama and other black establishment cats representing the democratic party got in on the act preaching the same credo asserting a culture of poverty argument that basically suggest that black are poor and need to go to college. As if all our problems are due more to having a poor education, than the neoliberal policies they unabatingly advance.
With Obama and his neoliberal economic locution, African American unemployment is still two times that of white unemployment. Economic disparity between whites and blacks has grown wider since his election and African American median income has fallen more than 10 percent with 26 percent of Black households being considered “food insecure.” Since Obama took office, the seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black Americans across the board has declined and the number of black food-stamp participants has increased more than 50 percent. Add to this that the percentage of black Americans who own homes has declined sharply and that real median income among black households based on data from your Census Bureau has also declined. This means a higher poverty rates for blacks since 2008, a reduction in the number of young black men with full-time employment and an increase in median white wealth providing them with more income at a pace way surpassing that of blacks under your administration. Maybe this is why it has been determined that single African American women ages 36 to 49 have a median wealth of $5. This is without me even mentioning the paltry rate of GDP growth since you took office. To put it bluntly, the economic liberalism of the Obama era was just a more murderous form of Reagan – unfettered (legal or illegal) immigration was encouraged and a blind eye was turn to both corporate tax evasion via overseas accounts and the activity of criminal banker activity on Wall Street.
All the can be connected in a causal manner to policy put in place by folk (99% democratic progressive liberals) elected to office or thought leaders, by the poor and working class black folk who have been distressed by said policies. Again, plainly put poverty and racism has only got worse during Obama’s tenure. Obama and democrats love to tout a higher minimum wage as being a solution but never answer how is this possible, when even with a higher wage, you cannot be sure that cats will give folk the hours they need just to get by let alone move out of poverty? How can this solve any economic issues sustained for blacks since democrats came to power during the post-civil-rights era and with democrats still pushing for capitalist globalization that has had a disproportionately negative influence on African Americans over the past 40 to 50 years? How can this help when 95% of the jobs created during the Obama Presidency were temporary? And don’t say because we talk about education because the reality is that African Americans with some college education have higher unemployment rates than whites who never went to college or even completed high school?
It was President Obama in 2014 that stated "if Uncle Jethro would get off the couch and stop watching Sports Center and go register some folks and go to the polls, we might have a different kind of politics." This in a nut shell is neoliberalism, who's efficacy that even the IMF is starting to question. A philosophy which states we get rich if you vote for us and us alone while you black folk will remain restricted to unstable low wage service sector jobs (which are vanishing) and represent the fastest growing population of homeless in the U.S., women and children. This is one reason why economic position of African Americans have not changed since democrats began to represent all major urban areas since the mid-1960s. If I am wrong, then why have schools failed to improve and have been on a downward trend since then? Why have long-term job prospects in these same places decreased and even disappeared since then? Neoliberalism has never been shown to have been effective or even work in the real world, especially when it comes to improving the economic conditions of blacks regardless of location of residency. So, I ask you, why support a party that takes your vote and destroys your community and ability to enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Riddle me that Batman.
You got it, I am speaking about neoliberalism. I have defined neoliberalism policy as policy that transfers controls of economic factors from the public sector to the private sector. Neoliberals rather in the form of Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama, Tony Blair or The Clinton’s assert that economic and foreign policy that removes trade barriers and restrictions on capital flows is the best thing you can do to create job growth, economic prosperity, wealth and more importantly, eliminate or at least, lift folk out of poverty. Although apolitical, after the 80s, democrats (social democrats in France, Labor in England & Democrats in the U.S.) used this ideology to usher in and promote their views on domestic and foreign policy. A strange occurrence, since historically, these political parties were framed as being the representative of the little man, main street, the factory worker and union member. Establishing neoliberal free market foreign and domestic would mean that the democrats would not have to work with the vulture class. This meant forming more relationships with the elite and wealth of the big cities more so than the lowly farmers of the Midwest or miners in other states. Even in urban areas, it meant economic ostracization for minority communities until it was time to secure their vote.
This alone demanded that Democrats listen and accept more ideas from the wealthy and affluent, and it has been the same since Tony Blair and the Clinton’s. Although democrats proclaim their policies serve progressive and liberal objectives, the harsh reality is that the do not. They have led to the destruction of unions and reduction in collective bargaining rights while they claim to be the party of the working class. They have tightened relationships with the white-collar elite and for taking their money, have put in place policy that has help to suppress wages and wage growth. These policies have also resulted in the ruination of the auto industry as we have witnessed in Detroit. But they did not stop there. Starting with Bill Clinton, they even deregulated banks and had the gumption to tell the working poor that their situation was due to education, while rich liberals ignore the fact that even going to college, whether one finishes with a degree or not results in most African Americans having amassed nearly two times the amount of student loan debt than whites. Even Obama and other black establishment cats representing the democratic party got in on the act preaching the same credo asserting a culture of poverty argument that basically suggest that black are poor and need to go to college. As if all our problems are due more to having a poor education, than the neoliberal policies they unabatingly advance.
With Obama and his neoliberal economic locution, African American unemployment is still two times that of white unemployment. Economic disparity between whites and blacks has grown wider since his election and African American median income has fallen more than 10 percent with 26 percent of Black households being considered “food insecure.” Since Obama took office, the seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black Americans across the board has declined and the number of black food-stamp participants has increased more than 50 percent. Add to this that the percentage of black Americans who own homes has declined sharply and that real median income among black households based on data from your Census Bureau has also declined. This means a higher poverty rates for blacks since 2008, a reduction in the number of young black men with full-time employment and an increase in median white wealth providing them with more income at a pace way surpassing that of blacks under your administration. Maybe this is why it has been determined that single African American women ages 36 to 49 have a median wealth of $5. This is without me even mentioning the paltry rate of GDP growth since you took office. To put it bluntly, the economic liberalism of the Obama era was just a more murderous form of Reagan – unfettered (legal or illegal) immigration was encouraged and a blind eye was turn to both corporate tax evasion via overseas accounts and the activity of criminal banker activity on Wall Street.
All the can be connected in a causal manner to policy put in place by folk (99% democratic progressive liberals) elected to office or thought leaders, by the poor and working class black folk who have been distressed by said policies. Again, plainly put poverty and racism has only got worse during Obama’s tenure. Obama and democrats love to tout a higher minimum wage as being a solution but never answer how is this possible, when even with a higher wage, you cannot be sure that cats will give folk the hours they need just to get by let alone move out of poverty? How can this solve any economic issues sustained for blacks since democrats came to power during the post-civil-rights era and with democrats still pushing for capitalist globalization that has had a disproportionately negative influence on African Americans over the past 40 to 50 years? How can this help when 95% of the jobs created during the Obama Presidency were temporary? And don’t say because we talk about education because the reality is that African Americans with some college education have higher unemployment rates than whites who never went to college or even completed high school?
It was President Obama in 2014 that stated "if Uncle Jethro would get off the couch and stop watching Sports Center and go register some folks and go to the polls, we might have a different kind of politics." This in a nut shell is neoliberalism, who's efficacy that even the IMF is starting to question. A philosophy which states we get rich if you vote for us and us alone while you black folk will remain restricted to unstable low wage service sector jobs (which are vanishing) and represent the fastest growing population of homeless in the U.S., women and children. This is one reason why economic position of African Americans have not changed since democrats began to represent all major urban areas since the mid-1960s. If I am wrong, then why have schools failed to improve and have been on a downward trend since then? Why have long-term job prospects in these same places decreased and even disappeared since then? Neoliberalism has never been shown to have been effective or even work in the real world, especially when it comes to improving the economic conditions of blacks regardless of location of residency. So, I ask you, why support a party that takes your vote and destroys your community and ability to enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Riddle me that Batman.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



