The Womb is a Sterile Environment Not a Memory Hole [Unless You a Puzzy]

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

The Woken Dead and Free Speech

I was told by a dear and near relative of mine that lunacy and idiocy have no bounds and are infinite in the individual mind as infinite as the number of particles, forces and mass-less particles in the universe. No I am not talking about the woman that ordered Chocolate Ice cream and when they did not have any, decided to take a baseball bat to the shop and break out all of the windows, nor am I talking about the fools at DuPont who want to start mass market selling breast milk to adult humans like bottle water or Gatorade. What I am referring to is the ultimate in hypocrisy and equally incoherent, laughable and ill-advised.

Recently, a TV opinion personality was asked by of all people, rappers to be removed and fired from the television show that they host. Fox news host Laura Ingraham has gained this attention from Snoop Dogg, T.I., and the Game, because of a comment made with regards to lyrics of a song he participated on with YG called “FDT.” FDT is short for “F— Donald Trump.” Now since I do not have TV or cable on my farm, I searched for the clip online to see what was the big fuss that had all of the tricks G-strings up their cracks. After watching the segment, I found nothing disrespectful of or directed toward the death of the rapper. In addition, I did not see anything to suggest and validate she was making fun of his death. What I observed was a person intentionally making fun of the chorus of the song by saying “OK, that's a very creative refrain" and suggesting in jest that the person repeating the chorus was no Leonard Bernstein.

What gets me is the two-faced audacity of a group of people who continuously cite freedom of speech to record, promote and make money off of lyrics that advise to kill the police, kill other black men, sell other black people drugs and treat and call women thots, ho’s and bitches. Yet they want to prevent someone else from expressing and having the same right of free speech to make a living. Snoop has the right to say what he says and so does Laura Ingraham. Regardless if you agree with it or not. Don’t watch, change the channel. Just as I have the right to call out dumb-fcks proclaiming fake outrage when someone is critical of a so-called expletive-ridden protest song against President Donald Trump. If you support Trump, why not ridicule the lyrics of the song? The lyrics are not the person and since when has it been illegal to be critical of any work of art or music?

And the critics are people who sided with Pennsylvania rapper Jamal ‘Mayhem Mal’ Knox, who wrote a song about being arrested by the Pittsburgh police in which they not only rapped "Let's kill these cops cuz they don't do us no good," they also mentioned the arresting officer’s names and posted pictures of them in a music video.

I am tired of all the clout chasing, want to be famous in the vein of Martin Luther King and Malcom X, Jussie Smollett always on their period type cats. You need to fall back if you ever rapped about killing cops, pimping hoes, groupie’s, incessant misogyny and saying bitches ain’t shit but ho’s and tricks. Fall back if you so sensitive that it is okay for you rap about ‘I'll choke yo ass out like Dre did that bitch’ and ‘if a nigga pull upon me at the light and it's a choppa in site ‘but you don ran out of tampons because some rightly in their opinion, called a trash chorus trash. If you ever been ordered to pay for sexually assaulting a woman and singing about killing and calling black people n#### every other word, you need to fall back too.

This is truly the age of the BITICHIFICATION of black men in America. Stop complaining so much and direct your attention on real and serious issues. Racism I hate to tell you isn’t that big a deal when you look at real concerns confronting the black community. You need to cut off your TVs and stop getting histrionic when you hear something you don’t like. You do not have the right to tell or decide for others what they want to watch or see. This is the epitome of hypocrisy, rappers against free speech – this is truly the woken dead.

Lady McBath

Lady Macbeth was a bitch. She is one of Shakespeare’s most ill-famed and downright evil. She was a crafty woman who employed craft and zealous means only available to women to obtain and achieve power - simply put, cruel manipulation at any cost. The root of all of Lady McBeth’s desire is sexism. We see this in several ways, including how she cajoles her husband to go along with her wicked tactics.

Here in the metropolitan Atlanta area, we have a reincarnation of Lady McBeth and her name is Democrat Rep. Lucy McBath. Rep. McBath (D-Ga.) came too prominence after she became a staunch ant-second amendment and gun confiscation proponent after on the day after Thanksgiving in 2012, her 17-year-old son was shot and killed by a white man while sitting in a car with a group of friends at a gas station after an argument of the vehicle occupants playing their music loud. Since that tragic event, she has been able to Georgia's 6th congressional district that was in the hands of Republicans for many, many years prior to her 2018 midterm election victory.

Since becoming a member of the congressional delegation from Georgia. McBath has started to feel herself. In many ways, like Lady McBeth, Lady McBath has morphed into a frightening female character who is equally ambitious and ruthless. She is a bully and just like Lady McBeth (who manipulates her husband throughout the play, McBath employs a similar approach with anyone who speaks out against her, her policies or disagrees with her. This is particularly true when it deals with issues of racial injustice and violence against minorities. When one does, she will go on the attack screaming racism or sexism, for that is the standard when someone says something another person doesn’t like or when they want to stifle views antagonistic of theirs.

This past week we saw that when McBath targeted a well-known Atlanta radio host for an innocuous comment suggesting that she go “back to the kitchen.” Upon which she immediately began to campaign fund raise from the statement saying “I've been dealing with these kinds of sexist attacks since day one. Can you help me fight back? Donate.” Seeing this was not enough, she also had radio host suspended without pay. In an interview she stated: “it is definitely indicative of a mindset that just hasn't succumbed to the fact that women are leading the charge politically, women are stepping up, taking our place, having a seat at the table."

The caricature of McBath is simple, attack by using the language of anti-racist activists. This serves to distract from the fact that she represents the 6th district of Georgia but lives in Tennessee. She would call such a documented truism a sexist or racist attack albeit the Cobb county tax commission has confirmed that she does not meet the standards to call Cobb county her primary residence the three years leading up to her election. Her home remains in Rockford, Tennessee.

Saying “get back in the kitchen” isn’t sexist unless get back into the bedroom, get back into the den or get back in the garage or building is sexist. Neither is “go back to sewing.” Statistics prove that in the U.S, more women practice sewing than men. This is like saying go back to cutting the grass or changing your oil is sexist.

Our current climate is flawed. Asking for someone to be fired or punished merely for differences in motive, intent and semantics is the new bullying. If lady McBath is a victim, being a member of one of the most elite institute in America, the U.S. country, then anyone on some puzzy ish, can be considered a victim over anything.

Fake News by Omision

If you do a search on the protest in France, you will find it hard to find any information on the topic although it has been going on each weekend across the entirety of France for twenty weeks. Do not even attempt to find coverage on NBC, MSNBC, CNN, ABC or CBS because it doesn’t exist. Imagine that, hundreds of thousands take to streets weekly around the nation and it isn’t considered news worthy. To top it off, Macron has responded with strong arm tactics that we would expect from the leader of Saudi Arabia, Sudan or Venezuela. Thousands arrested, hundreds injured and several dead. Macron's government has repressed the Yellow Vest movement violently over going on 22 consecutive weeks. Recently Macron ‘s government banned yellow vest protests from being held along Paris’ Champs-Elysees avenue. Now he has taken it even farther, deciding to mobilize the army on this upcoming Saturday as part of the Yellow Vests rallies.

As I stated, this has been going on for five months. For twenty weeks, tens of thousands have gone and continue to go to the streets of Paris and other French cities on Saturday on behalf of anti-establishment gilets jaunes protests. And as the prior weeks, riot police fired tear gas at protesters across the nation because Macron and his administration do not or cannot acknowledge that most French people, especially outside of Paris, live worse now than they did a few years ago and even worse under Macron. For his part, President Macron and his government, in response to legitimate demands, has given his army permission to shoot at gilets jaunes protesters as if to say the rights of the EU run paramount to the rights of French citizens and that even if you open your eyes, European Democracy is merely an illusion.

Why were the gilets jaunes protesting? First to express their displeasure against government policies they do not desire wants and against increasing fuel prices due to the introduction of green taxes that place the environment over the people. There is also the issue of an increasing the cost of living under a former banker elitist President who not only appears to be but who is out of touch with most of the French. This can only be the case if it was more important to deal with climate change by strapping the common citizen with a carbon tax.

President Macron is steadily losing control. Although Paris is the 2nd most expensive city in the world, most government employees make on average about $1600 a month on average. To compound this, the average rent of these workers as around $1100 to $1200. These are legitimate concerns yet as opposed to address them, Macron basically declares martial law, bans the freedom of protest and assembly, orders the police to shoot his citizens with rubber bullets and water cannons and put the French military on the streets to protect the rich. Truth be told, Macron has France looking like what we would see in Russia, Argentina or Turkey. Only difference if the media saw it there, they would be up in arms and outraged. Especially the leadership of the EU, they would be calling anyone doing what Macron is doing a despot. Add to this that President Macron has signed into law legislation giving security forces greater powers at demonstrations that opponents claim violate civil liberties, you have the making of a plutocratic Tsar.

Like I said, this should be weekly international news in the U.S., but you will never see a peep on CNN showing any footage of Macron’s police tear gassing and brutalizing unarmed #GiletsJaune (#Yellow Vests) protesters in Paris for the 22th weekend in a row today. The irony is that Macron is calling the #yellow vests terrorists while calling AL Qaeda in Syria freedom fighters and that he is willing to use repression and military might to quash this movement. However, mainstream western media is too busy lying about no one spied on Trump or promoting disproven Russian election interference to report in such real impactful news. But one can best believe that the yellow vest protests have proved the biggest challenge to French President Emmanuel Macron since he came to power, and they will continue to be for as Huxley wrote, “Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.”.

Social Justice: Scientific Racism by Another Name

By practice I am an infectious disease scientist and a behavioral epidemiologist. As a result, I am well read (or at least trying to become) in the behavioral sciences, one area of which I have a suitable interest is in the history of the behavioral sciences with respect to racism. This has become more of an interest currently in the age of social justice. To put it succinctly, I consider modern social justice warriors to be reinvigorating an age I considered long past and dead, the age of scientific racism.

Scientific racism as a school of thought, practice and research advances the supposition that certain groups, particularly Blacks, are different and less intelligent when compared to other racial ethnic groups especially Whites, although immutable, that these differences are unchangeable, innate, genetic and will exist regardless of any other actions or events. It is evident that these beliefs are reemerging in the class of progressives, in specific the younger generation. I say this because what is visible, is that claims of truth, not based on fact, are leading to behaviors and policy that are following the guidance of what we saw in the scientific racism and eugenic communities of decades prior. If one proclaims that they are Black and therefore I will always be this or that or oppressed, poor, economically disadvantaged and a victim, or that you are White and you will always be this or that, smart, wealthy and privileged based on characteristics one cannot change, you are essentially arguing the same logic that scientific racist and eugenicist did scores of years prior.

It may not be obvious at first, but this is a dangerous supposition for this form of reductionism occurs because people in the delusion that they are doing good, employ race to exact and refer to the distribution of a character of an individual based on the group as a collective. In this model there is no room for individual differences and even worse, personal responsibility. In addition, it merges the unfitness of social outcomes with biological outcomes, which scientifically are mutually exclusive.

More than 70 years ago, these same principles were being touted as standard settled science. Among example eugenicist, races were observed in hierarchies and divided into distinct groups such as the Nordic and Mediterranean Europeans to which social characteristics were ascribed. Social justice warriors of today continue these same practices and divide or group people based on race and consequently ascribe social characteristics to said groups based on skin pigmentation singularly. Strange seeing that if one truly desired to combat racism, maintaining artificial collective difference of a group based on skin color over the uniqueness of the individual is not the most advantageous way to go about such. Instead it only extubates the existence of racial dogma, albeit unverified scientifically to exist, that furthers dived people based on race and reduces the opportunity for open discussion about race.

It is as if proponents of social justice and identity politics do not see or know that they are advancing the contemporary notion of race born out of Darwinism, David Hume, Sir Francis Galton, Johann Blumenbach and Carl Linnaeus. They either are unaware or do not notice that they are presenting a social definition on presumed cultural and physical differences of which are the same ones that laid the foundation for how we understand race and racism presently.

Unfortunately, this ambiguity is not only unscientific and not empirical but unsafe. It is this type of thinking that justified the oppression Blacks, colonization, slavery and imperialism based on skin color. It led to Margret Sanger and planned parenthood and the belief that Blacks should be exterminated. It led to Nazi Germany carrying out of eugenics programs which resulted in the extermination of millions of Jews, homosexuals, gypsies, blacks and the sterilization of tens of thousands of others.

These social justice warriors do not see how their worship of identity politics only serves to venerate white supremacy and validate acceptable yet unique cultural and behavioral characteristics unrelated to biological determinism. Sadly, they continue to enact nonsensical behavior in the name of justice when what they spew only inoculates racial injustice.

How History Repeats Itself

It is an objective historical fact that one of the more noxious and defiling contribution Democrats inflected on Blacks in America was the concept of segregation based on separate but equal. This was a consequence of White Democrats (nationwide) desire to keep the races separate. Before the Civil war, there was no reason to have laws segregation blacks or slaves from whites, it was the de facto outcome of the peculiar institution. However, after the war, unattested fears of Blacks being unfit to exist in a civilized white world in concert with being consider brute who posed threats to white women, states (mostly in the South) started to put laws and ordinances on the books that legalized racial segregation in public facilities. Nine states, from 1887 to 1992 implemented such laws which would extend segregation principles in public facilities including but not limited to parks, restaurants, trains, schools, cemeteries, and theatres. In aggregate, these were called Jim Crow and they persisted from the 1870s into the 1950s.

The civil rights movement in the U.S., especially the south, was started to end the practice of segregation. However, Democrats fought tooth and nail against this and eventually had to concede defeat when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 became law. However, it seems that history has a funny way of repeating itself and the same liberal progressive actors that introduced the norm of segregation more than 140 years ago are back at it again, yet this time with a unique co-conspirator.

It seems that segregation is all the rage presently, on U.S. colleges and universities. Now true, there has always been some form of (self) segregation on predominately white college campuses by different racial and ethnic groups, especially Blacks, but the way in which it is happening now is an indignity to those that pushed so hard to disprove the fallacy of separate being agnate to equal. Across America, because of identarian politics, post-modernism and political correctness, white progressives have been able to reinject the infectious prion of race differences in Black behavior that promotes and support segregation. As Alfred Edmond, Jr wrote, “Segregation was never good for black people. We were not better off during Jim Crow. Not even a little bit. Those who wax nostalgically about how we thrived during segregation and leveraged it to our economic advantage to support and sustain healthy, strong black communities are just straight-up wrong.”

The new standard is to promote and engender social division as opposed to encourage collective assimilation. From California State University to the University of Connecticut (where there will even be a dormitory specifically for males who identify as black) separate but equal is being promulgated as acceptable. It doesn’t stop there. From no white allowed pool parties to a Black Georgia Mayor Banning White Reporters from Press Conference to Black only graduations at Harvard, the nonsense borders of something that should be outlined as a mental disorder in the Diagnostic manual of mental disorders. Last I heard, institutions of higher learning were supposed to be places where young adults. In contrast, Black students seem to want to stick their heads in the sand or retract in their turtle shell away from the real world they will eventually have to function in.

This in my view, just serves to polarize and fracture the social fabric of the U.S. We cannot ignore that there is an existential value in learning from others that have different perspectives on issues with which we are all concerned with? Why is it okay to assign acceptable bias to non-whites while simultaneously assign negative bias regarding race to whites? This is as stupid as it is inconsistent. What does skin color have to do with thoughts, ideas, competence or ability? Boy, history certainly has a bazaar way of repeating itself.

What Nipsey Hussle’s Death Says about Black Hypocrisy and Fake Hashtag Activism

It is indeed a very sad day when any black person is taken from this world before the age of 35 for any reason. It is even worse for those under 25 and 15 years of age. To acknowledge this in our community means sending prayers to the victim’s family and love ones. It means extending a support that they may need honestly and sincerely. If one is a celebrity, then it means blessings in the age of twitter in the form of tweets lauding them as if they were the greatest and kindest person ever. Simple it means virtue signaling to the herd mentality.

This morning, as I sat on the toilet reading the multiple news feeds on my phone, I read that LA rapper Nipsey Hussle was murdered in a hail of gun fire in front of one of his businesses. As the word spread, virtue signaling in the form of 280 characters or less began pouring in. John Legend said “RIP Nipsey. I just spent Thursday with him filming a video for a beautiful new song we created with Khaled. We filmed in Inglewood, close to where he grew up. He was so gifted, so proud of his home, so invested in his community. Utterly stunned that he's gone so soon.” “My spirit is shaken by this! Dear God, may His spirit Rest in Peace and May You grant divine comfort to all his loved ones” Rihanna tweeted. Meek Mill added: “we really fighting for our lives against our own kind and really have to take risk and match the level of hatred that we are born in I’m tired prayers for my brother and his family.” I could continue but you get the message. Any additional listing would only be nauseating but take it from me, everyone from LeBron James to Jada Pinkett Smith had something to say. My good friend and former colleague Rodney Carmichael at NPR described him as a “Grammy-Nominated Rapper and Philanthropist.”

It is true that Nipsey had turned his life around and had become a change for good. But I asked myself as I read the inundation of tweets, let us suppose he had been killed by a white policeman, what would the tweets may have said then, instead of an alleged African-American fellow gang banger? What virtue should be signaled then? I’m certain anyone wish prayers in the first scenario would be vilified. Wishes of prayers for cops killing black men are useless and pathetic, but when we kill each other they are the right thing to do. Not to mention since he has changed his life for the better what he did before doesn’t matter and isn’t important in explaining who he is as a person, but if it was some other person, who may have dressed like Bruce Lee twenty years ago, or touched a woman on their booty, especially being non-black, it would synthetic hashtag outrage.

Now I am not bashing Nipsey and as a man feel for his family, but the thinker in me is attracted to hypocrisy. Think about it, no mass protest will be arranged for this man, but if he had been killed by a cop I am sure it would. Moreover, let us not forget that he was a member of the Rollin' 60s Crips (a life time membership) and openly demonstrated this on the cover of his Bullets Ain't Got No Name series in 2008. His new album continued his preoccupation with calling folk N*****, the drug game, materialism, street life and yes – set tripping. Take the lyrics from the song Succa Proof from his latest album Victory Lap: Look, I don't fuck what you niggas done, I don't give a fuck where you niggas from, For you and your mouth go and get a gun, Leave you slumped on the scene, that's a hit and run, Oh y'all Bloods, oh y'all Crips now, Fuck it, I'm big draws, I'm J. Prince now.”

Again, I repeat this is a sad lose. He was doing big things in the community and holding down his family like men should do, both being the images we as men should incessantly present to our communities. However, we have problems that only we can address. However, this requires us be honest with ourselves, leaving hypocrisy behind and acknowledging that they exist. Yes, racism exist, but it isn’t our biggest obstacle or problem, that would be us. We know that homes with two parents and fathers in them are likely not to be in poverty, have kids drop out of high school, less likely to have a daughter pregnant before graduation, are more likely to go to college and male children are less likely to get caught up in the criminal justice system. WE KNOW THIS, yet we act as if this is because of systemic racism. Last I looked systemic racism had nothing to do with using a condom, keeping your legs closed, saying no to having unprotected sex, doing homework with your children and not using the television set as a baby sitter. We know that African American males represent about 6 percent of the U.S. population but commit almost 40% of murders and comprise nearly 60% of all murder victims (Another reason why our homicide rate is four times the U.S. average).

There was NO reason we as a community and nation should have lost such a prosperous soul as Nipsey Hussle. But if we do not address why this type of senseless outcome keeps occurring, whether rich or poor or famous or joe citizen, we will never make any progress. We should be equally upset for Nipsey as we do Darion Strong. We should be equally upset for HeavenSutton as we are Oscar Grant. But none of this will ever change if we put out in the universe that the death of a black by a white person is more valuable, interesting and important than a death of a black person by another black person. The more these liberals hypnotize blacks to keep on virtue signaling (the action or practice of publicly expressing opinions or sentiments intended to demonstrate one's good character or the moral correctness of one's position on a particular issue), the less likely we will have the desire and power to acknowledge and solve our own problems, and the more we live in areas like Baltimore where only 13 percent of city students are considered proficient in In fourth and eighth grade reading and one-third of High Schools in Baltimore, last year, had zero students proficient in math. RIP NIP, we will make something good out of this.

Weekend Reading: 3/29/2019

San Franciscans raise $46,000 to stop homeless shelter in wealthy area

U.S. Projected to Add 1.5M Illegal Aliens to Population this Year

As Many As A Million Calves Lost In Nebraska – Beef Prices In The U.S. To Escalate Dramatically In The Coming Months

Pew Research: Deporting Illegal Aliens Is Top Priority for GOP Voters

Charles Barkley on Smollett Hate Hoax: ‘We All Lose’

Kim Foxx Spoke at Fundraiser Hosted by George Soros‘ Son This Month

As Another Migrant Caravan Approaches, Trump Revives Threat To Close Southern Border

Man With Sword Fatally Shot by Police at Church of Scientology in Inglewood; 2 Officers Struck by Gunfire

President Bouteflika's decision not to seek another term has failed to calm protesters who want overthrow of old system.

Armed Samaritan Shoots Man who Shot at Basketball Players in Memphis

Valid concealed carry holder, pulled out a gun on a man who allegedly attempted to steal belongings from his car Monday night in Rockford

‘DREAMER’ Wanted For Murder Caught In North Carolina

Child Rapist Found Back In Kansas, Only Nine Days After He Was Deported

Illegal Alien Who Repeatedly Stabbed Woman With Broken Beer Bottle Was Living Off Of Taxpayers

US calls airstrike on Yemeni hospital ‘awful’... then asks Saudis to investigate THEMSELVES

11 dead, 16 wounded in Somalia bomb blast, say medics

MACRON ON BRINK: French president CONDEMNED over resignations - ‘He is ISOLATED!’

Border Patrol struggles with surge of migrants in El Paso, Texas

Acte XX des « gilets jaunes » : interdiction de manifester à Avignon, Toulouse et Rouen

Seattle is Dying

From the people that brought you "Hillary by a landslide"

Weekend Reading: 3/22/2019

Goodbye to the Internet: Interference by Governments Is Already Here

Clinton, in newly revealed emails, discussed classified foreign policy matters, secretive 'private' comms channel with Israel

The bump stock ban is just days away. What will owners do?

Newly prescribed ADHD medications may cause psychosis, study finds

Oregon lawmakers consider raising own pay by 63 percent to boost diversity

Fentanyl deaths skyrocketed more than 1,000% over six years in the US

Don't have a heart attack but your implanted defibrillator can be hacked over the air (by someone who really wants you dead)

NJ Governor Signs “Rain Tax” Bill; Residents Can Now BE TAXED When It Rains On Their Property

Rooster Tests POSITIVE For Deadly Contagious Disease In Northern California

Study: Migrants Use Almost TWICE The Welfare Benefits As Native-Born Americans

Police: Illegal Alien Killed Four Americans to Steal Money for Meth

The digital detectives determined to get rid of shooting video

U.S. Mercenaries Arrested in Haiti Were Part of a Half-Baked Scheme to Move $80 Million For Embattled President

Intersectionality and the Victimhood Olympics

The recent terrorist attack in New Zealand got me thinking about something. It got me thinking how selectively we attach meaning to events in this age of intersectationally and victimhood. Now I am no expert on intersectionality but what I can gather is that it is a catch all word for collective oppression even if oppression doesn’t exist. I would even go as far to argue that no one even knows what the word intersectionality means. Why New Zealand? Well because it seems that doing what some fundamentalist Islamic jihadis do to other Muslims is less of a deal than a white evil criminal does. Why, because being a Muslim on the rakings of victimhood is higher than being white, heterosexual and male.

After reading the professional social media troll job of the 73 plus pages manifesto of the main Christchurch shooter. I realized that he was only interested in three things: hate, murder and trolling the mainstream media. It was if he knew that key words like Donald Trump, PewDiePie, Anders Behring Breivik and Candace Owens would peek the ire of a media that is willing to do all it can to blame Donald Trump, conservatism and white men for all the ills of society in the modern age of intersectionality and victimhood. True, he referenced Nelson Mandela as well, but as expected, the former leader of the terrorist military wing of the African National Congress in South Africa would be ignored, because black and African ranks high in the top twenty-five of victimhood as well.

It is as if the mainstream media ignore similar attacks and atrocities because they do not feed into their narrative. There was no Western media coverage of the Fulani jihadists who raided the Nigerian Christian villages of Inkirimi, Dogonnoma, and Ungwan Gora in the Kajuru Local Government Area this past week, burning more than 100 homes, wounding dozens and killing 52 people. In addition, there was barely a peep when Boko Haram killed over a hundred Christians in Northen Nigeria destroying as many if not more homes. Clearly Islamic fundamentalist hate Christians in Nigeria, but you will die before you see any of this in the mainstream news. The same can be said of Islamic jihadists in the mainly Christian eastern region of the Congo and CopticChristians in Egypt.

This is not even restricted to Christians but Shia Muslims also. From Pakistan to Kabul attacks on Mosque demonstrate a similar level of devastation as we saw in Christchurch. A recent attack in Kabul by a suicide bomber resulted in the deaths of more than 50 people and wounding 94. I am not saying this is reflective of Islam, since 95% of Muslims do not engage in violence. But I am saying that Western media will intentionally ignore these events to push the synthetic narrative, without objective data, that white supremacy is on the rise and that it is due to American political discourse.

As a Black man, I want to make it clear I am not defending white supremacy. Supremacy beliefs of any kind are not only foul but equally incorrect and inaccurate. But I am defending math, and if you add up all the deaths caused by white supremist attacking churches and mosque worldwide since the election of President Trump and all the deaths caused by fundamentalist jihadis attacking churches and mosque worldwide during the same period, one would see that the former is a rarer occurrence than the latter.

Now back to this murderous bigot. Although he is being labeled as a right wing white supremist, in his manifesto he clearly states the opposite. He wrote that he was not a conservative stating “conservatism is corporatism in disguise, I want no part of it” and that “The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China.” Clearly this is more left leaning socialist communism than Republicanis.

I consider this a classic troll job because he also makes clear of his intention which was “to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United States. This conflict over the 2nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. This balkanization of the US will not only result in the racial separation of the people within the United States ensuring the future of the White race on the North American continent, but also ensuring the death of the “melting pot” pipe dream. Furthermore, this balkanization will also reduce the USA’s ability to project power globally…”

Now back to the cult of victimhood and intersectionality. This entire event has been singularly displayed in terms of labeling one group the victim and the other the oppressor. The victim in this case are peaceful Muslims and the oppressor a white Australian gun lover. There is no attempt to blame the individual for this deed but rather select groups of people, in this case Christians, whites, gun right supporters and men. The first thing that came out of AOC mouth was to blame the NRA and sincere Christians who offer prayers for the victims. This would never come out of her mouth if Muslims, who frequently offer prayers for similiar scaled events in the West because that goes against the I-code.

But this is the age we live in, an age in which intersectionality for it to exist, requires a constant and concentrated focus on racial and ethnic identity. Doing such only ends up making all that ascribe to this dogma live with this dysfunctional mindset based on daily persecution for immutable traits regardless of circumstances. Therefore, we end up with fake hate crime hoaxes as we recently saw with Jussie Smollett. Smollett basically out of anger, blamed others by pointing fingers at a group of folks out of the intersectionality rankings: white, homophobic, Trump supporters so he could get others too feel sorry for him just to attract attention and avoid personal responsibility for his situation. He may be the first person to make 5 to 6 figures a week, who is on TV, with songs playing on the airwaves to see himself as a victim because he hates Trump, Trump supporters and didn’t in his mind, get the pity party he wanted.

Sadly, he will not be the last and was not the first since the election of President Trump. There was the Beloit College Muslim student who wrote anti-Muslim graffiti on his own dorm room door and the black member of a church in Greenville, Mississippi, who set it on fire and spray painted with the words “Vote Trump” on the building. There was also the 18-year-old Drake University student who wrote racist notes to himself and the New York woman who told police she was driving home when four teens confronted her, yelled “Trump 2016 telling her that she wasn’t welcome there. There was also the waitress in Texas who blamed racist cops for an offensive note targeting Mexicans and the Kansas State University student that reported graffiti left on his car. “Go Home N***** Boy” and “Whites Only,” that turns out they both wrote the notes themselves. Even Muslims have gotten in on the action. Right after Trump’s victory, a Muslim woman in New York claimed to have been attacked by a group of Donald Trump supporters on a New York subway. She too eventually admitted that she contrived the entire event to get attention because she was having problems with her father. These are only a handful of the many hate crime hoaxes since Trump was elected President, but they will never make the light of corporate media because they do not fit the prescribed storyline.

This is where we have come in 2019 America, where there is more value placed on being a victim from a supposedly oppressed group than taking personal responsibility. We have devolved into a social system this is not only acceptable behavior but is also applauded and encouraged. As such intersectionality has resulted into a victimhood Olympics of sociopathicbehavior where you wear your intersectionality victim medal around your neck like the congressional medal of honor or the Purple Heart.

Trump’s New Campaign Manager is the Democrats

The progressive liberal democratic Russiangate narrative is like the creature from the Black Lagoon and the Blob mixed together. It continues to evolve into a different mutant beast from day to day. It will mutate and alter as the Democrats in Congress see fit but no matter what, it will not go away for a long time. As it goes on, the only reality is that we will continue to hear the left scream RUSSIA and RUSSAIN COLLUSION. Why do we know this? Because Cummings, Nadler and Schiff all are on record basically saying that Trump will be under investigation for the duration of his presidency, with or without evidence. The scorched earth approach of the house is likely to turn up something for randomization shows that something is likely to stick some where when you throw stuff all around the room.

I find it comical that Democrats for example are still making a big fuss about Trump’s tax returns as if Putin has sent him a 1099-MISC tax form not to mention that US Tax returns are just digests of a person's wages and deductions. There is no special line in them requesting all income from black people, women, Asians or Russians for that matter seeing that a personal tax return is not a comprehensive leger of monetary transactions. Maybe the House Democrats do expect or think that Putin or the KBG will be sending Trump a 1099-MISC, but I doubt it.

Democrats as many Americans expect Trump not to be impeached for collusion with Russia nor should he. If you want to keep it one hundred, Trump’s true crime was running for President and beating Hillary fair and square after the establishment and its media had prognosticated that he would not and that a Trump victory was impossible. Democrats will never man-up and admit this because they are too stupid. Think about it, only an idiot blames one factor or individual for everything that is wrong all the time incessantly especially as it pertains to political outcomes. Now there is nothing wrong with Democrats blaming Russia and maybe there could be some good too come of it. However, if it is just to get Trump because one is a sore loser, the price to pay maybe hell.

Possibly some good albeit unintentional, could come from this as I said. Maybe by investigating everything Trump ever did could lead to something positive like better enforcement of financial laws & regulations, maybe even lead us to finally address the criminal class on Wall Street. I do not think that I am the only one that think that it is hypocritical to go after and imprison Paul Manafort and none of the big wigs that caused the financial crisis of 2007-08 or the Podesta brothers. To keep it real, Manafort’s only crime was working for a victorious Trump's campaign. But if nothing sticks, as I said prior, there will be hell to pay from the nearly 63 million people who voted for Trump, including Reagan Democrats (Democrats that voted for Obama at least once) and Independents. This will only reinforce the narrative that Democrats are stepping on each other, using investigations, many of which are duplicitous, and their new power in the House to fish for any dirt they can find in Trump's past, present and future (2020 campaign). Many, even some never Trumper’s will begin to ask simple questions because it really appears that the feelings of Democrats are presented to take precedence over their vote simply because some people don’t like Trump plane and simple. Causing personal discomfort and having one’s feelings hurt are not grounds to remove or impeach a sitting president. It is as if as I presented before, Trump’s actual crime is having the impudence of running for president and winning.

But such is the nature of the fickle, take Wikileaks for example. A lot of Hillary supporters, to this day, attribute culpability to Wikileaks for her loss. Now they have curved Manning for refusing to testify against Wikileaks. This democratic theater will only further divide the nation and reflects a precursor to totalitarian rule, since they really do not care about the country rather unfettered power and control. All and all, this manufactured confusion staged by the Democrats' is grotesquely irrational and reprehensible – and all due to their maniacal preoccupation to unseat and destroy Trump.

All of this should have been expected. Not only is the Democratic party leadership hellbent on impeachment they remain steady as she goes, which means they do not have to focus on offering telling policy that would benefit all citizens in general but rather will result in further division because it enables them to exhaust all their energy on the exploitation of identity politics. Moreover, it sends a more draconian message – don’t fck with the establishment or we will throw the legal books at you. This is what is meant by weaponizing politics and the legal system. And why do we have all of this? Because Hillary Clinton’s willy nilly proposing collusion between Trump and Russia (Putin). Now, however it is falling apart and all the same Democrats saying wait for the findings of the Mueller report are pulling full steam ahead to show how mad and how much they hate Trump, which means they require another lame excuse to blame Trump for Hillary losing and because the Mueller report most likely will not validate their Russian conspiracy claims. LMBAO.

To be sincere, I want all this Russian shi# to be over but unfortunately, proponents of this conspiracy are too invested psychologically in this surrealism to get over it, even if the Mueller reports demonstrates there was no collusion, they will be like the cats that say Tupac and Elvis are still alive. They (especially the predominantly left-leaning US media) will be the modern day equals to Tiberius Gracchus (At least what I understand from reading Plutarch) and other Roman emperors who used lese-majesty laws to go against Octavius and other opponents, including senators.

I’m just saying this Russian ish is foul, phony and unproductive and only an idiot can accept such as true given the cats promulgating such in the past have interfered in elections for decades around the globe inclusive even of murdering elected leaders. It took almost a decade for the US to get out of the McCarthy era, but 2019 cats too emotional, poorly read, and woke to get where I’m coming from. Funny to me because the Democrats do not see, with this Russina stuff, they are just reaassuring President Trump's re-election.

Faux Outrage & Outrage Journalism

Faux is an adjective which means not genuine, fake or false. Outrage is a noun which references a tremendously strong reaction of anger, shock, or indignation. Journalism is also a noun which refers to the profession of writing for newspapers, magazines, or news websites or preparing news to be broadcast. On the surface and in fact it is obvious that neither of the two nouns should ever be preceded by the adjective faux, but in 2019 they are as common as coffee and cream or Kool-Aid and sugar. Recently it has been brought to the fore that Tucker Carlson (who in my opinion has the best opinion show on television) said some things in jest ten years ago that today has some upset. The question is for me, is this sincere and genuine or faux temperament?

I think this is as Shakespeare wrote, Much to Do About Nothing and I will attempt to explain why. First, what person hasn’t said something that has been perceived to be offensive by someone? Let alone something years past that was ignored for the cultural norms of the time in which they were said were no big deal? I find these attacks on Carlson, and the call for a boycott on his show’s advertisers threatening for all and even reflective of totalitarianism. Totalitarianism being a system of life and/or government that is dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state or central beliefs proffered by a mob majority that attempts to control and direct all aspects of individual life through coercion and repression. In this sense, totalitarianism is the antithesis of individual freedom. I find this frightening, hypocritical and inconsistent. Last, no person has the right not to be offended – NO ONE.

For example, if Tucker can be ruined for what he said ten years ago, why not hold rappers to the same standard. Snoop Dogg on Dr. Dre’s Bitches ain't shit stated and I quote: Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks, Lick on these nuts and suck the dick, Gets the fuck out after you're done. Sarah Silverman, Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon all wore black face, with Kimmel pretending to be Karl Malone and Oprah Winfrey but there is no extremely strong reaction of anger, shock, or indignation. Then there is the founder of Media Matters for America President Angelo Carson racist and pejorative comments regarding transgender’s and people of color (I hate the term people of color). I would be inaccurate if I did not include the New York Times editorial board member Sarah Jeong who tweeted "Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men," “#cancelwhitepeople,” “White people have stopped breeding. you’ll all go extinct soon. that was my plan all along” and “Dumbass fucking white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.” I would be remiss if I did not mention Joy Reids homophobic blog post and comments or CNN producer Delaney Strunk's and Matthew Yelgsias racist comments.

I understand some will consider me an apologist for bigotry, but I do not see it. This is not about conservative or liberal because I know many on both spectrums that see tweet and statement archeology as vile and a useless act unless one desires to punish one they disagree with. The outrage isn’t real, and it is time people admit they just hate the targeted individuals’ beliefs and ideas. If it upsets you that someone uses the word faggot, or nigga, or calls someone an ass hole, then the problem is likely you. I have and continue to call folks ass holes because it is an apt description of cats that spew flatulence from their oral cavity in the form of nonsense in sentence form. Frankly, if it hurts their feelings I DO NOT GIVE A FCK. Moreover, it is clear the faux disdain is mainly from the east and west coast enclaves of liberal hypocrisy. If you see blue check twitter outrage cats like @GeorgeTakei [NY], @brianstelter [NY], Scott Dworkin [NY], @JuddLegum [DC], @joncoopertweets [NY], @justicedems [NY & DC], @tedlieu [CA], @JYSexton [NY but claims GA], Qasim Rashid [DC], MichaelSkolnik [UKN], & @zachheltzel [LA] are just a few who seem to have a problem. All I am saying you have no right to tell me or even deprive me of what I want to watch or read because you do not like it – change the channel. But this is about the control of the idea space of what folks autocratically think others should not even be exposed to because they are smarter and know best and I speak of this first hand.

Recently I was banned from twitter because I responded to an underhanded tweet by Judd Legum suggesting Trump supporters were too dumb and stupid to understand their support. I did not appreciate this nor appreciate any white man telling this black man that he is in essence a dumb negro. So I sent him some some lyrics of one of my homeboy’s songs, Big Mota. Now mind you twitter allowed me to share tis video on YouTube many times but when I sent the lyrics to Judd they banned me for a week. When I returned, one of my followers (@LikkleGalBigGun) asked what I did to get banned and I said in quotes, I sent this in response to a derogatory tweet to a white city boy: 'Faggot ass nigga bought his chain and went and made a diss It's extorting season pussy nigga, get in line Marquis don’t make me turn your block into a columbine If you disrespect a man, you get the consequences These niggas tell you anything for some damn attention.' Within a minute I was banned permanently.

This is not about Tucker Carlson but rather folks who are too afraid to debate or even listen to views different from theirs. They are cowards and would rather call one names like racist, bigot, islamaphobe or stupid than address facts. These cats do not care about what he said for their primary objective is to silence him by depriving him from being able to work. This is easy to do by finding innocuous nothings in the form of words to strike up partisan points. Again, this is about thought. They want to tell you what to say and how you can say it. They want to tell you what tot think and how to think. These people do not respect our constitutional republic. This is why Thomas Jefferson wrote: “A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where 51 percent of the people may take away the rights of the other 49.” He was correct I remain to count the days until this same unhinged mob begins to burn books, and best believe it is coming and soon and the day when we all dig up every word a cat anyone ever said will be the day we weaponize politics and validate the existence of thought crimes.

AOC Manages to make Stupid Look Smart

I reckon it is about time I finally made my peace with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. By peace I mean saying what I truly think of this product of upscaled Westchester county New York. I really didn’t give her too much attention until recently. Sure, I laughed at her a lot, especially her lack of understanding of basic math and the political process. However, this week took the case when she attacked moderate Demokkkrats for not following her hook, line and sinker to vote the way she wanted them to vote on HR 1112, or what is called the "Charleston loophole" bill. I won’t go into detail on the Bill, but I will discuss what AOC vehemently rejected to: A Republican amendment requiring that undocumented immigrants who try to buy guns be reported to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

From what I understand and have read from the mouth of AOC, she does not seem to understand the way votes are made by representatives, this is too say that they vote for their constituency and not those of the NY 14th District of which she represents. This aside from the fact that she thinks that the former bartender thinks that the three “chambers” of government are the “presidency, the congress and the house.” I say this because as stated previously, all those other representatives were elected by their constituents and are there to represent their interests, not AOC, the 14th District of New York or the Demokkkratic party. I do not know how much it cost to get an education from Boston University, but her presence alone should make all parents leery of sending their children there.

AOC won her race with 16 percent voter turnout. This means that of the 700,000 living in her district, just 112,000 bothered to vote. This is far from a mandate let alone reflects a plurality of the district. Yet she parades around and behaves as if she is God’s gift to the world, righteous even. Yet when Demokkkrats from other districts had the gall to represent the views of the people that put them in office, she went to bully mode and threatened to place all moderates who did not vote for what she wanted on a list. Need I remind folk that it appears that if other representatives dare to represent their own states and their interests, not go along with her, she reduces herself to threats and the tactics of bullying. Bullying is to “seek to harm” (be voted out of office), or “intimidate, or coerce” another individual usually in a vulnerable and weaker position.

It also seems as if AOC takes the approximate 110,000 votes she did gain as a mandate to rule the nation. I also imagine that that Boston University education provided the self-proclaimed democratic socialist no instruction in history. Specifically, history of how communism was started and implemented in places the likes of China, Russia and North Korea and equally the results of these nations. This is frightening, for if she is an accurate representation of young pampered, self-absorbed, spoiled and easily offended by words Americans today, we will be a dead nation before the twelve years (which we have seen before) in which she proclaims the world will end because of cow farts and hamburger eating. Another history lessen she should revisit is that of Joe McCarthy. It was he in a similar tone, in the 1950’s who stated: In the 1950's Joe McCarthy proclaimed, "I have a list of 200 communists in the state department." The question to be asked next is, you find yourself will there be another list. This is the socialist communist way and once you are on a list, next thing you know you will have the thought police knocking at your door in the middle of the night.

Now back to the amendment to the bill. Why even have more extensive background checks on firearm sales if it excludes notifying any law enforcement authorities if an alarm goes off during the background check? If she was serious about this bill, this would be of singular importance, otherwise, she doesn’t really care and exhibits that her true intention is abolish gun ownership for all Americans – that is except for illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrant gun ownership matters. Likewise, it appears that laws that deny US citizens Second Amendment rights should be enforced while illegal immigrants are encouraged to break laws by crossing our borders uninhibited.

These are just a few of my concerns. I couldn’t understand the Green New Deal after reading it several times because it read like something my 13-year-old daughter would write – logic and objectives included. From giving money to those un-willing to work to cow fart control and trains to Europe so we can get rid of all airplanes. Notwithstanding it is written as if all the other nations will do the same and will suddenly scrap their Air Forces, so we can all live happily ever after. Add to this ending having children (maybe therefore she and her kind are okay with murdering babies once out of the womb if their mother decides such for any reason. Then we get back to math. The problem with renewables is that we cannot store wind or solar energy and if there is no sun or wind there is no energy. Add to this it is estimated that there is not enough land (or silver) in America to generate enough solar power for our needs or room for wind turbines to generate enough power for our needs, all we will end up doing is burning more wood (deforrestation) and killing all of the native species of birds in The U.S.

I do not know if AOC believes what she says. What I do know is that a sovereign nation without borders and mass immigration will be impossible to provide free healthcare, housing and a basic income to all. Eventually resources meet their peak breaking point. AOC is a socialist, but always remember, socialism is merely the intermediary step before full communism.

Liberals Side with Illegal Immigrants over Blacks Born in America

Speaking on liberal progressive Democrats, Malcom X once stated: "The white Liberal differs from the white Conservative only in one way; the Liberal is more deceitful, more hypocritical, than the Conservative. Both want power, but the White Liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor and by winning the friendship and support of the Negro, the White Liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or a weapon in this political football game, that is constantly raging, between the White Liberals and the White Conservatives. The American Negro is nothing, but a political football." From this statement one can decipher two things: 1] that Malcom X had no love or respect for the progressive liberal left of American politics and 2] in many respect, he viewed Blacks who did in the similar vein as mindless serfs being conditioned to accept without question as their slave ancestors did.

What is ironic is what he spoke that day in 1963 is the present reality for Black America. In just 30 years, the Democratic Party has morphed into some sort of Star Trek space anomaly. When Clinton was President as well as Obama, border protection and building walls along the border was all the rage. Presently it is not and the new bevy of the Democratic mind meld are in lock step to make sure open borders are the future of America. Why? Because the Democrats are fighting for illegal aliens and have become more valuable to their ability to acquire and maintain power, that they have replaced African Americans on their hierarchy of political social Darwinism.

Everywhere one looks Blacks are taken a second place behind illegal immigrants. One of the biggest places we see this is in the criminal justice system. Take California for example. Since the late 1980s, activist in California were trying to obtain government funding to assist in reducing over crowing in jails and hire more public defenders. The funding was never available according to law makers. The tune is different today because funding is being cut for public defenders in California while inordinate funds are being found to protect the rights of criminal illegal aliens. Last year in California, lawmakers approved $45 million to expand legal services for immigrants to assist more than 2 million people living in the state illegally and to protect them from deportations. Two years before that, the state put in place a “sanctuary state” bill to expand “sanctuary city policies, prohibiting state and local law enforcement agencies, including school police and security departments, from using resources to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect or arrest people for immigration enforcement purposes.”

This is happening all across the country. Recently in Denver Mayor Michael Hancock announced plans to set aside hundreds of thousands of dollars to form an immigrant legal defense program and similar efforts are being introduced in San Francisco and Seattle. In Washington State a bill was just passed that prohibits discrimination by employers and landlords “based on citizenship or immigration status.” As one writer and radio host put it: “In other words, if an employer had two equally-qualified candidates to choose from — one a citizen and one an illegal immigrant who had been deported several times — and the employer hired the citizen, this could be grounds for a lawsuit on the immigrant’s behalf…Under Washington state law, they would have the right to a cause of action against that employer if they were discriminated against because of their legal status...Now federal law might come in and have something to say about that, but this is what Washington state law would say.”

I do not mind helping people but I do expect US citizens should come first. In California, Blacks are suffering yet are being ignored. Although Black people in California are just 9 percent of the population of Los Angeles County, yet are nearly 40 percent of the homelessness. The same is true for San Francisco. The research results are startling. While 5 to 6 percent of San Francisco’s population is black, more than 40 percent of the city’s homeless population is black.

Albeit I am focused on race, on the micro level, on the macro level all American citizens loose when our resources are not used for the tax payers that provide them. Clearly Democrats have other interest than serving the people born in America, and have all but relegated the Black vote to side chick status, fact is US policy should focus on US citizens and the working men and women who want access to opportunity and a safe place to live. This is only possible if we address illegal immigration. Economically, it has been estimated that Illegal immigration costs taxpayers in all 50 states approximately $90 billion. In California it cost $12.3 billion to educate the children of illegal immigrants annually in grades K-12.

The progressive focus on taking care of criminal illegal aliens severely impacts outcomes for the worse in the African American community. First most illegal aliens come to America with very few years of schooling. This means they will likely end up in low-paying wage jobs. Not only will this put them in competition with poor blacks in the US with similar educational attributes but also other immigrants who came to the US before them. Thus with a larger pool of low skilled workers, wages will go down because there will be a surplus of workers to jobs. This point was hammered by then-chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, the late great Barbara Jordan of Texas in 1994 when she testified before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. She stated: "Unlawful immigration is unacceptable. … Failure to develop more effective strategies to curb unlawful immigration has blurred distinctions between legal and illegal immigrants. ... The Commission is particularly concerned about the impact of immigration on the most disadvantaged within our already resident society — inner city youth, racial and ethnic minorities, and recent immigrants who have not yet adjusted to life in the U.S."

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, recently said that "We are a nation and land of laws, not just [one where] some people are subject to laws and others are not." This maybe the only time to date I have agreed with her. However, I wonder why this isn’t the standard with respect illegal immigration? Because Black people are not reproducing enough to provide them with the unconditional and unearned votes we give them. Through democratic supported eugenic genocide in the form of abortions and Planned Parenthood, Blacks just do have as many children as the used to. And if democrats get their way for a mother to be able to decide to murder a child after it has been born, our population will really start to evaporate. This is one reason why AOC support people not having more children – just bring them over from 2000 miles below the Mexican border already made. Yes, in 2019, Liberals side with illegal immigrants over Blacks born in America, for criminal illegal aliens are the new black.