Tuesday, September 27, 2016
A coup is a sudden and violent, seizure of power
from a government. On occasion it has also been called a putsch. A little more than two months ago there was
such a violent attempt to overthrow the government in the nation of
Turkey. I heard about and read of
several theories regarding the effort ranging from it being a theatrical production of Erdogan to a plan of secular aspects of the nation’s body politic
as formalized via the exiled leadership of the Turkish preacher, former imam Muhammed Fethullah Gülen. However, none of these are even able to approach being
reasonable and logical in my estimation, notwithstanding they are somewhat
plausible.
If you asked me, I would say it was planned by
the Obama Administration in concert with NATO and implemented in the splendid
tradition of the standard U.S. ‘overthrow a democratically elected leader’
playbook under the direction of the C.I.A. of course. And no, I have no explicit proof of this but
history does support the tenable likelihood that I may be right and such is not
farfetched at all.
Although I could give numerous examples, I would
prefer to remind the reader of what we saw after World War II. After the defeat
of Japan in 1945 when it was forced to leave Indochina. At the same time a
movement was underway to free peasants in the region was taking off being led
by Ho Chi Minh. Although US globalist history will claim that this was a
communist led effort, the facts were that it was a grass roots operation.
As Howard Zinn noted, Minh, after he led the
overthrew the Japanese, he established the Democratic Republic of Vietnam
issued a declaration of independence based on the U.S. Declaration of
Independence and the French Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen. It was the first time ever Vietnam was free
from foreign rule (and nearly foreign occupation) in history - however the West
wasn’t about to let this happen. At the time, the English was occupying South
Vietnam, which they eventually returned to the French. Concurrently,
Nationalist China under the leadership of Chiang Kai-shek controlled the
northern part of Indochina, which the U.S. persuaded them to return it to the
French.
To make a long story short, the U.S. did all it
could to prevent Minh’s desire of Vietnam unification and created South Vietnam
as an American protectorate making Saigon as head of the government under the
rule of a former Vietnamese official living in New Jersey named Ngo Dinh Diem.
Unfortunately Diem’s rule was unpopular not to mention he was a Catholic in a
country where most were Buddhists. And for that extra icing on the cake, he
imprisoned all who criticized his administration.
In 1961 Kennedy became president and continued
the policies of Truman and Eisenhower in the region. But by 1963 Diem had
become even more autocratic and when a Buddhist monk set himself afire in
Saigon to protest the artificially established U.S. government, it led to more
monks committing suicide by fire to demonstrate their opposition to the
government. With the approval and permission of the U.S. by Kennedy, American
Ambassador Henry- Cabot Lodge and a State Department official named Roger
Hilsman, a group of Vietnamese generals began plotting a coup to overthrow
Diem. The result was the assassination of Diem and his brother.
Now many may not see the similarities but for the
purpose of brevity I will explain. The
manner in which the opportunity arose in Vietnam for the U.S. to take advantage
of a leader, whom in this case they selected and supported until his
over-the-top autocratic rule and push for control was perceived as unacceptable
by his citizenry, is ironically similar to the comportment of the citizens of
Turkey with respect to Erdogan, albeit he was not handpicked by the U.S. he had
been working on behalf (to what extent) of the military and geopolitical
interest of the U.S., Europe and NATO.
Historically, when democratically elected
governments (as with the case of Iran in 1953) or puppet autocratic states (as
in Vietnam) and even states in between (as in present day Turkey and the Ukraine),
the US will not hesitate to do whatever it can to protect the globalist
oligarch and plutocrats of the political establishment and military industrial
complex – even an invasion (as in the case of Iraq).
Historically for the U.S., the Coup has been and
will continue to be the weapon of choice aside assignation to topple any nation
that place their people before American and even western concern. Vietnam was
just one example. We saw the same in
Iran in 1953, where America (the CIA) spent millions to hire thugs and
professional protestors to act out a real life overly violent protest across
the streets of Tehran and this is based on the words of the CIA's Kermit
Roosevelt. When loyal troops to the democratically elected leader of Iran
Mohammad Mosaddegh it became even more violent resulting in the deaths of
hundreds eventually leading the forced resignation of Mosaddegh by members of
parliament and others whom had been bribed by Roosevelt some weeks before. Why were these actions taken, so America and
the U.K. could install their puppet Shah whom had agreed to restore Western
ownership of the oil industry which Mosaddegh vowed to take from the west and
nationalize it?
Then there is the example of Haiti in 2004 when
hundreds of U.S. Special Forces worked with, trained and invaded the country
from the Dominican Republic with anti-Lavalas.
U.S. Special Forces were used to trained FRAPH militiamen andanti-Lavalas forces in the Dominican Republic.
Upon which they invaded northern Haiti to set the groundwork for the
overthrow of President Aristide. This approach is typical for carrying out a
CIA ignited coup, in particular for Latin America, where they target nations
that desire political and economic independence from the U.S. We saw this in
Venezuela in 2002 and may be witnessing it currently. When successful,
participants are rewarded with loot or positions of leadership (see Egypt’s
Abdel Fattah el-Sisi for one such example).
In the end, the new leadership always ends up with the funding, backing
and support of the U.S.
In the case of Turkey, I suspect that Erdogan
bombing of U.S. supported Kurd's supposedly fighting ISIS in the North, and his
increasingly dictatorial control on the country in concert with Americas need
to have access to Incerlik airfield, everything came to boil.
Nonetheless, finding and instructing opposition
forces and the promotion of violence and unrest in the streets is how the U.S.
via the CIA create a state of emergency as a way to get rid of an elected or
government and to gain power such that U.S. interest are paramount over the
will and desires of said nation states.
All that is left is the right time to take action to remove the
government and install the coup puppet leaders in its place. We saw this work
to perfection in the Ukraine where the Obama coup machine had its most
successful outcome (too early to say regarding Yemen).
In January 2014 street protests turned violent in
Ukraine. Most of it was by the hands of
the neo-Nazi Svoboda Party and the Right Sector militia. Ironically the Right Sector militia had only
been in existence for less than a year at the time and documents show that it
is funded by Ukrainian exiles living in the west – mainly the U.S. and Europe
(another typical CIA ploy). We know that
the Obama administration via Assistant Secretary of State Nuland and Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt that the Obama Administration were waiting for and anticipating
a coup to happen in Ukraine.
These are just a few past and recent historic
examples that are extremely well documented.
This is why I am of the firm and assured belief that the Obama
Administration was behind this. Then
there is the photographic evidence that shows US Ambassador to Turkey, John Basse meeting with Turkish NATO Colonel Ali Yazici (in Photo) the day before the Coup
attempt on the afternoon of August 7th.
For the record Col. Yazıcı was one of the leaders of the
coup and former military adviser to President Erdogan. According to reports,
they met at Cengelkoy café the day before the coup.
The fact is that I may not be able to prove it
completely, but what we just saw in Turkey had U.S. DNA all over it. It was a
mirror image of what was observed in the Ukraine and to a lesser extent Iraq. And
If may be honest, Syria as well, for we all know it is not improbable that the
Obama Administration is supporting ISIS against Assad. I say this in all sincerity, for we knew Erdogan was sending weapons to ISIS and said nothing and Syria (Russia) just
intercepted conversation between US forces and ISIS right before we bombed and
killed scores of Syrian military fighters.
So say what you may, but I do believe the Obama Administration was behind this, what else can one expect from a president who is also a Nobel Peace Prize recipient?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thank you for sharing in this article obat bius ,
ReplyDeleteobat kuat ,
obat pembesar alat vital,
dr lee soo wook ,
I can a lot and could also be a reference I hope to read the next your article update